Fiction Undermining Theory: Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita and Freudian Psychoanalysis


Abstract views: 1322 / PDF downloads: 116

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2023.8.6.03

Keywords:

Literary Theory, Psychoanalysis, Applied Literature, Text/theory binary, Aesthetics, Discourse, Power/knowledge, Consumerism, Subversion, Dialectical

Abstract

The present article aims to show how this modernist novel resisted and actively undermined the overwhelming critical discourse of Freudian psychoanalysis that has dominated the critical and theoretical world of literary studies at the time. Although much has been said and written about the antipathy of Vladimir Nabokov to Sigmund Freud, very little has been written on what the novel has actively done in respect to reversing the epistemological power discourse that dominates the relationship of literary works to critical “theory.” The contribution of this paper is reading Lolita as an example of “applied literature,” i.e., a literature that anticipates, challenges, revises and undermines the critical theory that is supposed to read/analyze it. Theoretically, the paper benefits from contributions of scholars such as Shoshana Felman and Piere Bayard. The paper is sectioned into an introduction, a “classic” psychoanalytical reading of Lolita, a section that reviews and assesses the problems with such a reading, and a conclusion that sums up the findings of the study. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ghyath Manhel Alkinani, Senior Instructor, College of Law, University of Kufa, Kufa, Al-Najaf, Iraq,University of Kufa

Ghyath Manhel Alkinani is a senior instructor of English at the College of Law, University of Kufa since 2010. He has a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Ar., USA. in 2019. He has an MA. in English Literature from the University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq in 2010. Besides his main job at the College of Law in the University of Kufa, he teaches English Fiction and Modern English poetry at the colleges of Arts, Education, and Education for Women at the University of Kufa. 

References

Bayard, Pierre. “Is it Possible to Apply Literature to Psychoanalysis,” American Imago 56.3 (1999) 207-219. Web. 18 Oct. 2014. <https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/american_imago/v056/56.3bayard.html> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.1999.0009

Bernal, Kathryn Adèle Hardy. The Lolita Complex: A Japanese Fashion Subculture and its Paradoxes” MA Thesis. AUT University 2011. Web. 15 Nov. 2014. <http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/2448/HardyBernalKA2.pdf?sequence=3>

Bloom, Harold (Edit.). Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita. Chelsea House Publishers, 1987.

Darling, Kristina Marie. “An artistic harmonious balance between the reader’s mind and the author’s mind”: Vladimir Nabokov’s Literary Criticism as a Performance of Reading Practices.” The Kenyon Review. 28 April 2019. Web. 10 Feb. 2022.

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. The Johns Hopkins University Press,1998.

Dolinin, Alexander. “Nabokov’s Time Doubling: From the Gift to Lolita” Nabokov Studies, Volume 2, 1995, pp. 3-40. Web. 15 Nov. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2011.0099

De La Durantaye, Leland. “Vladimir Nabokov and Sigmund Freud, or a Particular Problem.” American Imago, vol. 62 no. 1, 2005, p. 59-73. Project MUSE, https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2005.0011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2005.0011

Field, Andrew. Nabokov: His Life in Art. Little, Brown, 1967.

Felman, Shoshana “To Open the Question.” Literature and Psychoanalysis. The Question of Reading: Otherwise Yale: French Studies, No. 55/56, (1977), pp. 5-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2930433

Freud, Sigmund. Interpretation of Dreams. trans. Abraham Arden Brill. Wordsworth Editions, 1997.

. . . “The Origin and Development of Psychoanalysis” The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Apr., 1910), pp. 181-218. University of Illinois Press. JSTOR. Web 04 Nov.2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1413001

Green, Geoffrey. Freud and Nabokov. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. 1984.

Holt, Warren. “Humbert, Nabokov and the Ego Ideal”. Other/Wise: Online Journal for the International Forum for Psychoanalytic Education. Volume 9: Winter 2012. <http://ifpe.wordpress.com> Accessed: 12 Nov. 2014.

Ingham, John M. “Primal Scene and Misreading in Nabokov’s Lolita.” American Imago 59.1 (2002): 27-52. Project MUSE. Web. 20 Nov. 2014. <http://muse.jhu.edu/>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2002.0004

Meyer, Priscilla. “Lolita and the Genre of the Literary Double: Does Quilty Exist?” Wesleyan University 2009. <http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1304&context=div3facpubs

Nabokov, Vladimir Vladimirovich. Lolita. New York: Vintage, 1997.

. . . . The Annotated Lolita. (Edit. Alfred Appel). New York: Vintage Books. 1991.

. . . . Strong Opinions New York: Vintage Books, 1990.

Sæverot, Herner. “Rhetorical Caricature: An Educational Reading of Nabokov’s Treatment of Freud” Phenomenology & Practice, Volume 5 (2011), No. 1, pp. 84-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19837

Shute, Jenefer Patricia. “Nabokov and Freud: The Play of Power.” University of California, Los Angeles ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1983.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Ghyath Manhel Alkinani. “Fiction Undermining Theory: Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita and Freudian Psychoanalysis”. The Creative Launcher, vol. 8, no. 6, Dec. 2023, pp. 17-32, doi:10.53032/tcl.2023.8.6.03.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

ARK