Exploring the Significance of Literature: A Humanistic Perspective


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2024.9.5.02Keywords:
Literature, Society, Human Life and Values, Aesthetic Sensibility, Humanity, Empowerment,, Structure, CultureAbstract
This essay critically focuses on the functions of literature in understanding the complexities of human life and society, perceiving cultural values, and evoking aesthetic relish from a literary humanistic approach. It is an attempt to answer two questions: why we should read literature? What are the functions of literature? Basically, literature is a form of art that has multidimensional functions to portray human life and human experience with its artistic pattern and organization that affects the readers in a certain way not only to rethink and feel about others and themselves but also to establish and change their worldviews whether subjective or objective. Though literature offers an alternative world view, it is not limited to ideas or thoughts, as it can reflect on any subjects. The prime object of literature is to depict human life, to delight, and teach humankind through its artistic principles and aesthetic effects and universal appeal – the use of literary language and imagination and affected readers. Literature has humanistic, aesthetic, and psychological roles in the presentation of human nature, wisdom, humanity, morality, resilience, aesthetic pleasure, inner consciousness, and self-restraint. Finally, the value of literature is immense as it a site from where one can write for the change of a dominant ideology by providing an alternative one and enrich himself or herself with wisdom, self-esteem, and inner consciousness.
Downloads
References
Culler, Jonathan D. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford UP, 1997.
Dryden, John. “An Essay of Dramatic Poesy.” English Critical Texts: 16th Century to 20th Century, edited by D. J. Enright and Ernst De Chickera, Oxford UP, 1962, pp. 50-110.
Frye, Northrop. The Educated Imagination La Imaginacion Educada. Indiana UP, 1964.
Horace. Ars Poetica. Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica, translated by H. Rushton Fairclough, Harvard UP, 1942, pp. 442-89.
Iser, Wolfgang. “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological approach.” Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader, edited by David Lodge, Longman, 1988, pp. 211-28.
Leavis, F.R. The Great Tradition. Chatto and Windus, 1948.
Said, Edward. “Opponents, Audiences, Constituencies and Community.” The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, edited by Hal Foster, Bay Press, 1983, pp. 135-59.
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. A Defence of Poetry. English Critical Texts: 16th Century to 20th Century, edited by D. J. Enright and Ernst De Chickera, Oxford UP, 1962, pp. 225-55.
Sidney, Philip. “An Apology for Poetry.” English Critical Texts: 16th Century to 20th Century, edited by D. J. Enright and Ernst De Chickera, Oxford UP, 1962, pp. 3-49.
Wellek, Rene, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. Lowe and Brydone, 1949.
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Penguin Classics, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Creative Launcher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.