A Pragma-stylistic Analysis of Two Poems by Wi’aam Mulla Salmaan


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2024.9.6.05Keywords:
Pragma-stylistic study, Yeaning to Iraq poems, Speech act theory, Metaphorical implicatures, Deixis, Stylistic markersAbstract
The present paper offers a pragma-stylistic study to two selected poems that express the theme of “yearning to Iraq” composed by the contemporary Iraqi poetess in exile: Wi’aam Mulla Salmaan, which express her individual experiences and emotions of loss due to the forced severing of her living in her native homeland. This has been done by exploring the ways in which pragmatic theories of speech acts, metaphorical flouting of Grice's maxims, and deixis can be stylistically applied to decoding the performative messages conveyed in the selected poetic texts. A second aim has been to see whether or not the stylistic qualitative and quantitative densities of such pragmatic features (or their absence) serve to pinpoint certain identifiable individual stylistic markers in these two poems. Data analysis has revealed that those pragmatic theories offer a valid and functional basis for unravelling poetic themes, emotions, attitude, and values expressed in the data. In addition, the regularities and irregularities in their use of particular speech acts, metaphorical implicatures, and deixis serve as markers of their individual styles. Thus, it has been found that the poetess singular use of commissive speech acts only at the close of each one of her two poems is one marker of her poetic style. Another individual stylistic marker of hers in the data is the overwhelming use of metaphors and personifications in contrast with her scarce use of similes. Also, the poetess’s yearning to Iraq renders the densities of the deixis that spell out this poet-visa-vie-homeland juxtaposition particularly high. Data analysis has also shown that the expressive and assertive speech acts may be not mutually exclusive in one and the same utterance, and that one utterance can spell out more than one speech act.
Downloads
References
Acheoah, J. E. (2017) Searle’s Speech Act Theory: An Integrative Appraisal. American Research Journal of English and Literature, Issue 1, 1-13.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bach, K. (2005). The Top 10 Misconceptions about Implicature. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80.03bac
Black, E. (2005). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626373
Brown, G., & Levinson, S. C. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Chapman, S. (2011). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34519-5
Fillmore, C. J. (1971) Lectures on Deixis. CSLI Publications.
Grice, P. (1975). “Logic and conversation”. In Cole, P.; Morgan, J. (eds.). Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts.: Academic Press. pp. 41–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
-------. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
Genovesi, C. (2020). Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 157, p. 17-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.002
Hanks, W. F. (2009). “Fieldwork on deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics. Towards an Emancipatory Pragmatics. 41 (1): 10–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.003
Hickey, L. (1993). Stylistics, Pragmatics and Pragmastylistics. Belgian Journal of Philology and History, 71-3 pp. 573-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.1993.3890
Jackson, H., & Stockwell, P. (2011). An introduction to the nature and functions of language. A&C Black.
Jakobson, R. (1960). “Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in language (pp. 350-377). MIT Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983/2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976
Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis” in Pragmatics. pp. 54–96. Available at
https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_59489_2/component/file_59490/content.
Searle, J. (1968). ‘Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts,’ The Philosophical Review, 77: 405–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183008
––– (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
––– (1975). ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts,’ in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 344–369.
––– (1979). ‘Indirect speech acts,’ in his Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press.
––– (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press.
––– (1989). ‘How performatives work,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 535–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773
––– (2011) Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. OUP.
Vanderveken, D. & Kubo, S. (2001). Introduction. Essays in Speech Act Theory, John Benjamins, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.77.01van
INTERNET REFERENCES
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Creative Launcher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.