Decolonizing Disability Studies: Identities, Epistemologies and Global South Perspectives


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2024.9.6.07Keywords:
Decolonization, Disability studies, Postcolonial theory, Indigenous knowledge, Global South, Ableism, Intersectionality, Colonial legacies, Cultural epistemologies, Disability justice, Representation, Alternative frameworks, Hegemonic narratives, Lived experiencesAbstract
This research paper explores the concept of decolonizing disability studies as a critical and transformative approach that challenges the Eurocentric presumptions that currently dominate the field. Disability studies as traditionally constituted often perpetuates a colonial epistemology by universalizing Western conceptions of disability and neglecting other cultural, historical, and geopolitical contexts. This study explores the connections between colonialism, disability, and systemic inequalities in order to advance an inclusive, pluralistic paradigm that gives voice to oppressed groups and indigenous knowledge systems. The study looks at how colonial legacies have shaped global perceptions of disability, especially in the Global South, where ableist beliefs are deeply embedded in policy, healthcare, and education. The imposition of Western biological ideas of disability, which often overlook indigenous and local interpretations with deep social and spiritual roots, is contested. By emphasizing decolonial theory, the study emphasizes the significance of opposing these hegemonic frameworks and advancing a more nuanced understanding of disability as a lived experience influenced by intersecting identities such as race, class, gender, and geography. This study employs an interdisciplinary technique, drawing on concepts from critical disability studies, postcolonial philosophy, and indigenous scholarship. It employs case studies from Asia, Africa, and Latin America to illustrate the diversity of disability experiences and the resilience of regional narratives that resist colonial and ableist conceptions. Through five case studies, the paper demonstrates how community-led initiatives and indigenous knowledge can direct more egalitarian and context-sensitive approaches in disability research, policy, and activism. The study also argues for a shift in thinking from one that sees disability as a weakness to one that respects and acknowledges the agency, creativity, and achievements of individuals with disabilities in their unique cultural settings. The study also makes the case for a change in perspective from one that views disability as a deficit to one that values and honours the agency, inventiveness, and accomplishments of people with disabilities within their cultural contexts. By appreciating different epistemologies and collaborating on knowledge production with academics and activists from the Global South, it advocates for the decentring of Western academia.
Downloads
References
Amorim-Maia, A. T., Anguelovski, I., Chu, E., & Connolly, J. (2021a). Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Climate, 41, 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
Amorim-Maia, A. T., Anguelovski, I., Chu, E., & Connolly, J. (2021b). Intersectional climate justice: A conceptual pathway for bridging adaptation planning, transformative action, and social equity. Urban Climate, 41, 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
Chataika, T., & Goodley, D. (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Disability Studies. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310709
Connell, Raewyn. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Polity, 2007.
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., Aikins, A. D., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Cutajar, J., & Adjoe, C. (2016). Whose knowledge, whose voice? Power, Agency and resistance in disability studies for the Global South. In Springer eBooks (pp. 503–516). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_32
Das, Veena, and Renu Addlakha. “Disability and Domestic Citizenship: Voice, Gender, and the Making of the Subject.” Public Culture, vol. 13, no. 2, 2001, pp. 320–349.
Degener, Theresia. “Disability in a Human Rights Context.” Laws, vol. 3, no. 3, 2014, pp. 144–165.
Dirth, T. P., & Adams, G. A. (2019). Decolonial theory and disability studies: On the modernity/coloniality of ability. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 260–289. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.762
Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann, Grove Press, 1967.
García, María Elena. “Cosmologies of Disability: Indigenous Perspectives from the Andes.” Disability & Society, vol. 23, no. 1, 2008, pp. 70–89.
Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995347
Grech, S., & Goodley, D. (2011). Doing Disability Research in the Majority World: an Alternative Framework and the Quest for Decolonising Methods. Development Human Handicap Et Changement Social, 19(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086899ar
Grech, Shaun, and Karen Soldatic. “Disability and Colonialism: (Dis)Encounters and Anxious Intersectionalities.” Social Identities, vol. 18, no. 2, 2012, pp. 189–202.
Grech, Shaun. “Disability and Development: Critical Connections, Gaps, and Dilemmas.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, 2009, pp. 53–75.
Hall, Stuart. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Open University Press, 1997.
Kafer, Alison. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana University Press, 2013.
Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.602860
Meekosha, Helen, and Russell Shuttleworth. “What’s so ‘Critical’ about Critical Disability Studies?” Disability & Society, vol. 24, no. 1, 2009, pp. 49–71.
Meekosha, Helen. “Decolonising Disability: Thinking and Acting Globally.” Disability & Society, vol. 26, no. 6, 2011, pp. 672–682.
Mji, Gubela, et al. “Ubuntu and Disability: Towards an African View of Disability.” Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 3, 2009, pp. 240–250.
Oliver, Michael. The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan Education UK, 1990.
Opini, B. (2015). Walking the talk: towards a more inclusive field of disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1073800
Peruzzo, F. (2021). A call to rethink the Global North university: Mobilising disabled students’ experiences through the encounter of Critical Disability Studies and Epistemologies of the South. Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833211029381
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Routledge, 2014.
Shakespeare, Tom. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Routledge, 2013.
Staples, J. (2020). Decolonising Disability Studies? Developing South Asia-Specific Approaches to understanding Disability. In Springer eBooks (pp. 25–41). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2616-9_2
Taylor, S., & Sidhu, R. K. (2011). Supporting refugee students in schools: what constitutes inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903560085
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations, 2006.
wa Thiong'o, Ngũgĩ. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.
Walton, E. (2018). Decolonising (through) inclusive education? Educational Research for Social Change, 7(spe), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2018/v7i0a3
World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. WHO, 2011.
Yeo, Rebecca. “Disability, Poverty and the New Development Agenda.” Disability & Society, vol. 20, no. 6, 2005, pp. 611–623.
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, 1990.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Creative Launcher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.