The Marginalized Vs. The Civilized: An Ecocritical Approach to Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay’s Aranyak

Main Article Content

Sandip Kumar Mishra

Abstract

Ecocriticism is a worldwide emergent movement which pleads for a sustainable development of all organisms. This revisionist movement criticizes the anthropocentric attitude of the humans which is a hindrance to a sustainable future. Today even in the twenty-first century when we witness a rapid growth of science and technology, the marginalized people are still being deprived of their equal rights to survive. They are yet to have a taste of true development even in the developed or developing countries. They are more ecological when the so called civilized people have put our ecology at stake. They are dedicated to their roots, yet they are being exploited by the capitalistic society. They even fall an easy prey to the state sponsored terrorism. Ecocriticism advocates development of every individual in close proximity with nature. The present paper seeks to explore the cultural clash between the civilized and the disadvantaged regarding their attitude to nature as evidenced in Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay’s Aranyak-Of the Forest. Care for nature which is the basic approach to Green Studies is the focus of this study. In view of the global environmental crisis, the article seeks to care the wounds of the dispossessed for a sustainable future of human as well as the non-human.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sandip Kumar Mishra. “The Marginalized Vs. The Civilized: An Ecocritical Approach to Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay’s Aranyak”. The Creative Launcher, vol. 1, no. 6, Feb. 2017, pp. 68-76, https://www.thecreativelauncher.com/index.php/tcl/article/view/422.
Section
Articles

References

"An Ecological Critique of Kalidasa’s Meghaduta ..." N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.

Bandopadhyay, Bibutibhushan. Aranyak. Kolkata: Kattayani Book Stall, 1939.

.... Aranyak: Of the Forest. Trans. Rimli Bhattacharya. Calcutta: Seagull Books, 2002.

Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge, London, England: Havard University Press, 1995

Coupe, Laurence, ed. The Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism (Routledge, 2000). Print

"Ecocide - Wikipedia." N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.

Frederick Suresh, Contemporary Contemplation on Ecoliterature, Authorpress,New Delhi,2012

Garrard Greg, Ecocriticism. Routledge, USA, 2004

Glotfelty, Cheryll and Fromm, Harold, eds, The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology (University of Georgia Press, 1996).Print

Jha Shivani, Ecocritical Readings Rethinking Nature And Environment,Partridge India,2015

"Literary and Cultural Theory - Indiana University." N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.

Mishra S.K.(2016) Ecocriticism in Children’s Literature: An Analysis of Amit Garg’s Two Tales.Galaxy,Vol-5, Issue5,91-97

Science, Thunderbirds. "Copy of Ecology - Chapter 3 Review (research project)." Prezi.com. N.p., 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.

Selvamony ZNirmal, Nirmaldasan,Rayson K. Alex, Essays in Ecocriticism,Sarup & Sons,New Delhi,2007,Reprint,2012

"Subject and Course Guides: Ecocriticism: The Basics." The Basics - Ecocriticism - Subject and Course Guides at University of Texas at Arlington. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.

"The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing ..." N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2017.